Facing a drug possession charge is a worrying scenario. After all, the potential punishment for losing in court could be years behind bars.
Fortunately, numerous legal arguments reduce this possibility. Every defendant should be fully aware of the available defenses.
Unlawful search and seizure
The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. If law enforcement officers did not have a valid warrant or conducted the search without probable cause, the court might rule the evidence inadmissible. Absent concrete proof, the prosecution’s drug possession case often falls apart.
Lack of possession
In this context, possession means having control over the drugs. A defendant can argue that they belong to someone else or that the accused had no knowledge of the substances being present. If the drugs are found in a shared space or within someone else’s belongings, this defense can be highly persuasive.
Chain of custody errors
The chain of custody refers to the documented process showing who handles evidence from the moment of seizure until it appears at trial. If this documentation has gaps or mistakes, it may raise doubts about the proof’s legitimacy. A court might subsequently rule the evidence unreliable, leading to a dismissal of charges.
Entrapment
Entrapment occurs when law enforcement officers induce people to engage in crimes they would not otherwise commit. If someone can prove pressure or coercion into holding drugs by an undercover officer or informant, a jury may find the entrapment defense valid.
Medical necessity
Sometimes, a defendant will argue that the drugs are medically necessary. Should the individual possess pharmaceuticals for legitimate medical reasons and be able to provide evidence such as a doctor’s prescription or relevant medical records, a court may consider this.
Anyone facing a drug charge should take the most strategically savvy stance. Discussing all options with a legal professional can help ensure that individuals understand their choices.